I do not have a problem with it in terms of policy, but it strikes me as unnecessary, since all of the factors are already listed elsewhere in the article.
It certainly tested my stomach, but adds little real information over what was covered in the previous few lines.
Damit ist — einzigartig im deutschen Sprachraum — nicht-vaginaler-Verkehr verschiedengeschlechtlicher Verwandter und gleichgeschlechtlicher Verkehr als Inzest pönalisiert.
What do you want the reader to take away from it? Telegraph Media Group, London 28.
Wikipedia doesn't have any porn except that which was produced centuries ago and is preserved for historical record only.
Not more porn than what you may see on a European beach.